ESPE Abstracts (2018) 89 P-P3-117

Compliance for Monitoring of Glycemic Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

Oleg Latyshev, Maria Simakova, Lyubov Samsonova, Goar Okminyan, Elena Kiseleva, Alexander Fialtov & Elvira Kasatkina


Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russian Federation


Topic: Compliance for monitoring of glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes.

Background and Aims: To estimate attachment of children with type 1 diabetes to self-control of blood glucose with help of automatically data processing system of glycemic control.

Method: We have checked 54 patients with first type diabetes at the age 14±3, 4 years old (32 males, 22 females), divided into two age groups: from 0 to 14, and 15-18 years old. There were 54 glycemic checking with help of automatic system of the analyzing self-monitoring results quantity of self-control of blood glucose per 24 h estimated based on last. The compliance self-monitoring index was calculated (quantity of the tests done/quantity of the recommended tests (5)*100%). Compliance index more than 90% has considered acceptable.

Results: Median quantity of average checking are 4.3 (3.2; 5.3) a day, median compliance index is 85% (64;106), average value of HbA1c 8.1%±1.8, shows insufficient compliance in total group. Median quantity of average checking in girls’ cases are much higher (Me 4.8 vs 3.6, P=0.04), either the compliance self-monitoring index too (Me 96.3 vs 72.9%, P=0.03). In two age groups – from 0 to 14, and 15–18 years old, median quantity of average checking (Me 4.4 (3.6; 6) vs 3.7 (2.6; 4.7)), P=0.08, and the compliance self-monitoring index (Me 87.2% (73; 116) vs 74% (51; 93.2)), P=0.09 did not differ significantly. But in group 0–14 years old average HbA1c value 7, 6%±1.1 is much lower, than in 15–18 years old group -average HbA1c value 8.6%±2.1. Patients with HbA1c <7.5% (21/54, 39%), (average HbA1c value 6.7%±0.5) have better glycemic control. Median quantity of average checking is 4.7 (3.6; 6.1), median compliance index is 93% (73;122), than patients with HbA1c ≥7.5% (33/54, 61%), (average HbA1c value 9%±1.8) – median quantity of average checking is 3.9 (2.6; 4.6), P=0.05, median compliance index is 78% (52;92), P=0.04.

Conclusion: Automatic system of the analyzing and estimation of the glycemic control gives opportunity to estimate the compliance of self-monitoring tests in first type diabetes in children and shows satisfactory to self-monitoring skills. However, girls’ cases were better than in boys’ cases. Optimal management of type 1 diabetes in elder group presumably depends not only on frequent blood glucose monitoring, but other factors, such as puberty, stress, eating disorder, adult supervision too.

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.