ESPE Abstracts (2015) 84 P-2-558

Thyroid

Objective vs Subjective Measurement of Thyroid Volume by Ultrasound in Infants Referred with TSH Elevation on Newborn Screening

Chourouk Mansoura, Yasmine Ouarezkib, Jeremy Jonesc, Morag Attaied, Emily Stenhoused, Joachim Pohlenze & Malcolm Donaldsonf

9 views


aUniversity Hospital Abderrahim Harouchi, Casablanca, Morocco; bMother and Child Health Hospital EPSP BARAKI, Algiers, Algeria; cDepartment of Child Health, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK; dDepartment of Radiology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK; eUniversitats-Kinderklinik, Mainz, Germany; fSection of Child Health, Glasgow University School of Medicine, Glasgow, UK


Background: Establishing thyroid size as large, normal or small in newborn infants with TSH elevation and in situ thyroid is important for diagnosis and informing molecular genetic studies.

Objective and hypotheses: To compare intra-observer variation in the objective (Ox) measurement of thyroid volume (vol) by ultrasound (US); and the correlation between subjective (Sx) and Ox assessment.

Method: Joint blinded retrospective review of static images by two observers on two separate occasions in infants referred 2007–2013 with TSH elevation and eutopic thyroid. Combined vol was derived from the sum of each lobe using the formula length×depth×breadth×π/6. Images were then blindly reviewed subjectively as five categories: small, small-normal, normal, large-normal and large. Equivalent Ox size was determined using population-specific mean±S.D. of 2.4±0.4 ml to give corresponding vols <0.7, 0.7–<0.9, 0.9–<2.1, 2.1–2.3 and >2.3 ml. Correlation between Ox and Sx was defined as concordant, partial or discordant if categories were equivalent, 1 apart or 2 apart.

Results: Of 48 infants images were available in 42 (25 males: 17 females) comprising 17 with definite congenital hypothyroidism (CH), 18 status uncertain and seven transient TSH elevation. Causes of definite CH were dyshormonogenesis (DHG) in 13 – defined by proven mutation±thyroglobulin elevation±increased uptake on radioisotope scan; and thyroid hypoplasia in four (all with proven mutations). Length could not be measured in the images of five patients while assessment was not possible in a patient with allo-immune thyroiditis due to surrounding oedema. Mean±S.D. intraobserver difference in vol was 0.1248±0.23 ml, reducing to 0.06±0.05 ml after excluding three infants in whom extrapolation was needed because of enlarged glands. Ox vs Sx was concordant in 15 and partial in nine but discordant in 11 – including two infants with ‘bulky’ glands on Sx but vol 0.7–0.9 ml on Ox (PAX8 mutation in one, suspected NKX.2 disorder in the other) and in five DHG infants with enlargement on Sx but normal size on Ox.

Conclusion: Intra-observer error for newborn thyroid US volume assessment is small. Sx assessment may be markedly misleading. However, our method of Ox measurement ignores the isthmus, which may be enlarged in DHG. This may explain the discordance in some of infants with DHG and underlines the place of both objective and subjective thyroid US assessment in newborn infants.

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.

My recently viewed abstracts

No recent abstracts.