ESPE2024 Free Communications Growth and Syndromes (6 abstracts)
1Division of Pediatrics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 2Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 3Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 4Department of Paediatrics, Endocrinology, and Diabetology with Cardiology Division, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland. 5Department of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology with Laboratory of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. 6Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Instituto de Investigación La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de la Fisiopatología (CIBER) de Fisiopatología de Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III and IMDEA Food Institute, Madrid, Spain. 7Department of Pediatrics, UZ Brussels, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. 8Endo-ERN European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 9Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. 10Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, University of Genova, Genova, Italy. 11Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
Background: Severe primary insulin-like growth factor-1 deficiency (SPIGFD) is a rare growth disorder characterised by extreme short stature, low serum IGF-1 and normal/elevated serum growth hormone (GH). Some patients receive GH treatment before recombinant human IGF-1 (rhIGF-1; Increlex® [mecasermin]). We investigated rhIGF-1 effectiveness and tolerability in patients previously treated with GH versus GH naïve patients at rhIGF-1 initiation.
Methods: Descriptive analyses of rhIGF-1 treatment in prepubertal patients with SPIGFD in the Global Increlex® Registry (NCT00903110), with and without previous GH treatment. Linear regression analyses (unadjusted and adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting) compared height standard deviation score change from baseline (ΔHtSDS) at Year 1 between the populations.
Results: At data cut-off (20 April 2023), 174 GH-naïve and 41 patients with previous GH treatment were enrolled. At baseline, GH-naïve patients were younger, had greater HtSDS, lower height velocity and lower serum IGF 1 than patients with previous GH treatment (Table). ΔHtSDS was greater in patients who were GH-naïve versus those with previous GH treatment at Year 1 (P = 0.038 when adjusted for baseline parameters; Table). Similar proportions of patients presented ≥1 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs); 61.0% (n = 25/41) previously treated versus 65.9% (n = 114/173) GH-naïve. Hypoglycaemia was the most frequent TEAE in both groups.
Previous GH treatment (n = 41) | GH-naïve (n = 174) | ||||
Age, years | Mean (SD) 95%CI |
9.5 (3.4) 8.4;10.5 |
7.8 (3.7) 7.2;8.3 |
||
HtSDS | n Mean (SD) 95%CI |
39 −3.5 (1.3) −3.9;−3.1 |
157 −3.8 (1.5) −4.0;−3.6 |
||
Height velocity, cm/year | 30 5.2 (1.9) 4.5;6.0 |
86 4.7 (1.7) 4.3;5.1 |
|||
BMI SDS | 37 −1.2 (1.2) −1.6;−0.8 |
142 −0.8 (1.3) −1.1;−0.6 |
|||
IGF-1 levels, ng/mL | 38 111.7 (126.3) 70.2;153.2 |
161 69.8 (61.7) 60.2;79.4 |
|||
Year 1 ΔHtSDS | Previous GH treatment (n = 35) |
GH-naïve (n = 128) |
Estimated difference (95%CI) p-value |
||
Raw data | Mean (SD) 95%CI |
0.25 (0.51) 0.08;0.43 |
0.40 (0.43) 0.33;0.48 |
- | |
Unadjusted comparisona | Adjusted mean (SD) | 0.27 (0.07) | 0.40 (0.04) | 0.12 (−0.04;0.29) 0.141 | |
Adjusted comparisona,b | 0.28 (0.04) | 0.41 (0.04) | 0.13 (0.01;0.25) 0.038 | ||
aLinear regression analysis including baseline HtSDS and patient group as covariates; bModel based on inverse probability of treatment weighting method, propensity score computed with baseline characteristics: sex, age, HtSDS, height velocity, BMI SDS, IGF-1 level and highest stimulated GH level. |
Conclusion: With rhIGF-1 treatment in SPIGFD, GH-naïve patients gained more height versus patients previously treated with GH when adjusted for baseline parameters. Our assessment did not consider height response to GH or baseline characteristics at GH initiation.