ESPE2024 Poster Category 2 Late Breaking (107 abstracts)
1Centre hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. 2VUB University, Brussels, Belgium. 3Children's Hospital AUF DER BULT, Hannover, Germany. 4Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 5University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. 6Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. 7Children's Hospital, Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany. 8Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. 9Universitäts-Kinderspital beider Basel (UKBB), Basel, Switzerland. 10Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 11German Centre for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
Background: Cardiovascular risk factors largely determine morbidity and mortality in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Hyperlipidemia, especially in pediatric patients, is often undertreated, although it can lead to premature atherosclerotic changes. While non-HDL-C (non-HDL-cholesterol) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes, guidelines only define LDL-C treatment targets. According to current ISPAD guidelines, children with T1D and LDL-C > 130 mg/dl should be treated.
Methods: Analysis from 2010 to 2023 based on the multicenter German Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry DPV (311 centers from Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Luxembourg). Inclusion criteria were T1D, age < 18 years, at least 1 total cholesterol (TC) and HDL-C value documented simultaneously. Lipid values determined < 4 weeks after diabetes onset with ketoacidosis were not included in the analysis. Non-HDL-C was calculated as (TC – HDL-C). Since LDL-C and non-HDL-C are strongly correlated, we considered a non-HDL-C >160 mg/dl as pathological based on the treatment threshold of >130 mg/dl for LDL-C. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4.
Results: 34,682 patients were included (median; Q25/75): age 12.9 years (9.3/15.7), LDL-C 94 mg/dl (78/112.5), non-HDL-C 107 mg/dl (89.3/128), 53% male. Regarding the entire cohort, non-HDL-C was positively correlated to LDL-C (r =0.89), age (r =0.06), migration background (r =0.03), BMI-SDS (r =0.16), HbA1c (r = 0.2), and negatively to male sex (r =-0.13) and diabetes duration (r =-0.04) (all P <0.0001). In the age grou P < 6 years (n = 3,581), there was no significant correlation between non-HDL-C and migration background or BMI-SDS, in the age group 12-18 years (n = 27,243) not for non-HDL-C and age. In total, 8.0% had LDL-C >130 mg/dl, 5.8% non-HDL-C >160 mg/dl (age groups: < 6y: 4.8/5.6%; 6-12y: 6.2/4.5%; 12-18y: 9.9/6.6%). 1% received lipid-lowering therapy (mainly statins). 410 patients had LDL-C < 130 mg/dl, but non-HDL-C > 160 mg/dl. Of these 3.9% were treated with lipid-lowering therapy.
Conclusion: We found a positive correlation of non-HDL-C to female sex and HbA1c, and found higher non-HDL-C values in children with migration background > 6 years. Interestingly correlation to BMI-SDS was only present in children > 6 years. In contrast to other publications, we found a negative correlation with diabetes duration. In total, the vast majority of the cohort is undertreated for hypercholesterolemia. Additionally, 1.1% of the non-treated patients had an LDL < 130 mg/dl, hence no treatment indication, but still an elevated non-HDL-C. In these patients the cardiovascular risk might be underestimated.