ESPE Abstracts (2014) 82 P-D-3-3-919

Dynamic Stimulation Testing in Pediatric Endocrinology: Experience of a Pediatric Endocrine Unit in a Developing Country

Janani Sundaram, Hemchand Krishna Prasad, Gnanabalan Murugesan, Ravisekar Vasudevan & Thangavelu Sangaralingam


Mehta Children’s Hospital, Chennai, India


Background: Basal or unstimulated hormone levels frequently do not provide sufficient diagnostic information in the investigation of endocrine disorders. A range of dynamic or provocative tests are available to assess the dynamic responses of hormones and make necessary diagnoses.

Objective and hypotheses: To describe the experiences with dynamic stimulation testing of a Paediatric Endocrine Unit in a developing country.

Method: Retrospective review of case records of children who underwent dynamic stimulation testing in a Pediatric Endocrine Unit in a 1 year period (March 2013–February 2014).

Results: During the study period, 35 children warranted dynamic testing, of whom 29 underwent testing, reasons for not testing include: costs (50%) and risk explained (17%) and unknown (33%). GH stimulation testing done: stimulant: glucagon (n=4) and clonidine (n=7). Interpretations: GH deficiency; GH sufficiency; GH insensitivity; and neurosecretory dysfunction. Synacthen stimulation testing; indications – low basal cortisol levels (n=3) and abnormal neonatal congenital adrenal hyperplasia screening test (n=1): adequate cortisol reserve established. GnRH analogue test (n=4); diagnosis of thelarche variant (n=2); central precocious puberty (n=1); and hypothalamic amenorrhea (n=1). Other tests done water deprivation test, dexamethasone suppression test practical modifications include: combining two tests to share stimulant costs; reducing the number of blood samples; using analogues and avoiding i v cannulation. Three minor complications encountered during the study: minor anaphylactic reaction (Synacthen), hypotension (clonidine) and symptomatic hypoglycaemia (glucagon); no deaths. The average cost Indian rupees 6500±840 (€77); laboratory expenditure 76.3%. Other difficulties include discrepancy between dosage of stimulant calculated by body weight and surface area, difficulty in fasting infants, and inadvertent collection of sample in inappropriate container.

Conclusion: Dynamic stimulation tests are feasible in resource scarce settings of developing countries. They must be done in day care settings with all necessary precautions.

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.